Several newspapers (e.g., Irish Times, Independent, Examiner) are reporting that the Advisory Group on Unfinished Housing Developments has published its draft report today. I’ve searched the DEHLG and Housing and Sustainable Communities Agencies websites but can’t locate it as yet (the main page for unfinished estates on the DEHLG website is here). Going on what the newspapers say, there are 348 developments that are in need of immediate action to deal with public safety hazards (e.g., unsecured construction materials, open excavation pits, uncovered manholes, and partially completed buildings that could be unstable) where no current on-site work is being undertaken and the vacancy rate is over fifty percent. These estates may also suffer from a lack of public lighting, problems with water and sewage services, poor road surfaces, lack of pavements, and a lack of open areas. The identified developments are in every county, with particularly high numbers in Cork County (52), Cavan (34), Galway County (20), Dublin (the 4 LAs, 30), Donegal (23), Louth (17), Longford (16), Monaghan (14). Individual estates are not identified.
Minister Finneran has announced a fund of €5m for local authorities to use to help address the worst of these problems. Whilst the fund is very welcome, it only averages €14,360 per estate. For that kind of money one would think that the issues would have been addressed already and it seems highly unlikely that all the issues can be tackled for that sum. That said, it can certainly be used to address the worst of the problems, especially those that pose safety threats. However, the bigger and longer term issue of how to finish out estates still needs resolution. The draft guidance manual published late last year provides one roadmap, though as we noted in our own submission is far from ideal.
The issue of dangerous and developer abandoned estates is also far larger than the 348 estates identified; these are the worst estates that have the most problems. Lots of other estates have many of the same issues and using the criteria of 50% occupancy seems a rather arbitary way of delineating the level of risk. One could have an estate of almost full occupancy with a very severe hazard in it that needs urgent redress. Our analysis of the unfinished estates database shows that:
- 1,475 estates have uncompleted properties on them; 71% of these estates are non-active, i.e. they have effectively been abandoned by the developer for the time being
- 635 estates have more than 50 per cent of units under-construction
- 777 estates consist of 10 or more units where 50 per cent of units are either under construction or vacant (i.e. they are ghost estates as we originally defined them last January)
- 2,157 estates have residents (78,195 households)
- 1,102 occupied estates are complete but have vacancy
- 1,055 occupied estates are incomplete and may also have vacant units (454 occupied estates have more than 30% per cent of units in-complete)
Chairman of the advisory group John O’Connor, chief executive of the Housing and Sustainable Communities Agency, quoted in the Irish Times, himself acknowledges that the issues extend beyond the 348 identified estates, stating that local authorities were best placed to advise which estates in their areas were most in need of, or would most benefit from, funding to resolve public safety issues. In other words local authorities seem to be in a position to assess estates on a “site by site, case by case” to draw on the fund to address issues.
The key issue now is for Local Authorities to start drawing down the funding available and to address the really pressing health and safety issues in order to improve the lives of residents.
Rob Kitchin
February 18, 2011 at 12:22 pm
I’m going to ask the stupid question of “Why can’t we consolidate some of these half occupied estates into fully occupied estates?”
February 18, 2011 at 1:03 pm
Perhaps if local authorities that gave permission for these developments in the first place had listended to An Taisce. Then there would be no need to invest public money into consolidating them. Anyway, what of the insurance bonds that were taken out when permissions were given. Why dump this issue on the laps of the public purse, which can little afford it?
February 18, 2011 at 2:28 pm
Honestly, just bulldoze them and return the land back to agricultural use if that’s what its prior purpose was. The majority of these estates outside of Dublin are completely useless and only serve to aggravate sprawl conditions. We need to shrink the geographic footprint of towns and villages in Ireland, not spend public money to complete houses that should never have been started in the first place.
February 19, 2011 at 11:02 pm
“Minister Finneran has announced a fund of €5m for local authorities to use to help address the worst of these problems.”
5 million.!
Is this a last joke, before the Soldiers of Destiny they scurry off to their bolt holes, with a fortune in entitlements.?
May 6, 2011 at 9:14 am
[…] safety risks. I’m not sure quite what has happened in the last couple of months, but it was previously reported by the Advisory Group on Unfinished Housing Developments that there were 348 estates where vacancy […]