Today the government announced a new Construction 2020 Straegy for Ireland – the full report can be found here.
The strategy is to be welcomed in that we’ve needed an overarching strategy re. construction, property and housing for some time. It’s also good that it is wide in its remit, covering all the main areas. It seems to me the strategy is about four things:
1. creating a strong and sustainable construction sector
2. producing new jobs and getting construction workers back to work – the plan is 60,000 by 2020
3. Creating sustainable planning and communities
4. dampening down the cyclical nature of property development
In other words the ‘Strategy aims to ensure that necessary and sensible development can take place, and that it is not held back by unnecessary obstacles.’ It sets out 75 action points, quite a few referring to initiatives that have already been announced previously, though the strategy does tie all the stuff together into a roughly coherent whole.
The question is whether these action points are going to address the various problems and issues. At present, this is difficult to tell, because a lot of what the document sets out is a roadmap for finding solutions rather than providing solutions. At one level this is good – we need well thought out solutions. At another level it isn’t so great because we should have done the strategising a few years ago and now we’re trying to play catch-up whilst various forms of crises continue to play out around us – mortgage arrears, social housing waiting lists, rising prices, weak supply in some areas, oversupply in others, etc. The report is full of proposed new committees, task forces, review groups, consultations. Here’s a list of some:
- will propose a new national planning framework
- will publish a general scheme of a Planning Bill, along with a new Policy Statement on Planning, to implement the planning recommendations of the Mahon Tribunal and other planning concerns, and to establish an independent planning regulator.
- will create a Housing Supply Coordination Task Force for Dublin
- will produce a comprehensive strategy for Social Housing, setting out a vision for the sector.
- will undertake a review of Part V of Planning and Development Act
- will review Special Development Zones planning with the aim to streamline and speed up process
- will explore mechanisms for private financing and greater use of Public Private Partnership models for infrastructure procurement
- will engage with the banks, NAMA and other interested funding providers to ensure the availability of sufficient development finance
- will create a High Level Working Group chaired by the Department of Finance will be established to explore the issue of sustainable bank financing for the construction sector.
- will increase our engagement with the European Investment Banks (EIB) and European Investment Fund (EIF) in developing and implementing mechanisms designed to maximise the provision of financing to SMEs, including in the construction sector.
As it stands then, we have few concrete recommendations with respect to any of these things. These need to be set up asap and to do their work quickly. Ideally they will also be dealt with in some kind of a holistic way and not in isolation from each other.
There were a few concrete actions.
- National Pensions Reserve Fund (NPRF) is to become the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) with a mandate to invest on a commercial basis to support economic activity and employment in Ireland. Work with IDA and others to invest in offices/infrastructure.
- A tenancy deposit protection scheme will be provided in law this year
- Regional Planning Guidelines that co-ordinate local authority plans will be replaced by more broadly based Regional Spatial and Economic Strategies from 2016, with inputs from LAs, key infrastructure and economic development agencies
They are also proposing greater certainty and flexibility in planning:
- flexibility around overall densities will be considered.
- changes to existing planning permissions – though only after public consultation
- streamlined planning process for certain types – ‘repeat’ or ‘change of house type’ applications – and also for appeals
- enable local authorities to introduce a ‘use it or lose it’ provision with respect to land zoning to reduce land speculation
- vacant site tax – examine the possibility for enabling a local authority, should it wish to do so, to adopt measures that incentivise the use and development of vacant sites
- legislate for and introduce a registry of options on land for development purposes to ensure market transparency
Some issues seem to be in a holding pattern.
- Homelessness – Mentions setting up of Homelessness Oversight Group and aim to eliminate homelessness by 2016 but gives no indication of how that will be achieved, esp. in light of rising homelessness levels.
- Unfinished estates – no new policy just continue with Site Resolution Plans;
The strategy sets out then a roadmap for getting to actionable initiatives, rather than setting up many new initiatives. It does not set out many concrete actions but rather proposes a roadmap for dealing with construction and property issues. There are proposals for lots of task forces and reviews, some tinkering with existing legislation but no radical overhaul, but not a lot of new concrete, strongly cash-backed initiatives – schemes mentioned in the strategy are all relative small sums of money or restate existing public capital expenditure plans (which are a fraction of pre-crash levels).
What would have I liked to have seen? I would have preferred something a bit more holistic, rather than trying to frame a whole bunch of stuff as a coodinated plan. Personally, I would have started with a new NSS/NDP and worked down from there. I think it would have been useful to be more proactive in setting out options re. financing. How to get finance into initiating construction seems to be largely missing beyond saying the government will talk to and encourage NAMA, EIB, EIF, ISIF (Ireland Strategic Investment Fund) to make finance available and look at issues. I would have liked the government to be a bit more proactive in terms of initiating and driving funding, seeking ways to increase public capital expenditure. The strategy announced €200m of new investment into the various property related areas, but this is a tiny amount of funding vis-a-vis the issues that need to be addressed. Hopefully when all these various task forces and committees report, suitable budgets and means of financing can be attached to the action points, otherwise they’ll remain just that – action points, rather than actioned items.
Rob Kitchin
May 14, 2014 at 10:06 pm
[…] the doughty Rob Kitchin has waded through it on our behalf and gives his conclusions here. I don’t share his enthusiasm for National Spatial Strategies and National Development Plans, […]
May 14, 2014 at 11:13 pm
[…] Professor of Geography at NUI Maynooth, Rob Kitchin, has blogged his reaction to the strategy on Ireland After NAMA. […]
May 15, 2014 at 12:02 am
Homelessness to be eliminated by 2016? Nonsense!
Will site taxes be self imposed on Dublin City Council since they own a vast number of empty sites many of which are eye sores? This whole document is flawed from top to bottom. Pay me and I will sort the wheat from the chaff.
May 15, 2014 at 12:09 am
Rubbish. While nama retains ownership of so much of our land, zero progress is all that will result.
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
May 15, 2014 at 9:20 am
Thanks for posting this thorough review. Construction 2020 is probably less political than a lot of people were expecting. I would have like to see a lot more on housing funding initiatives, and funding vehicles / underwriting for social and affordable housing.
May 15, 2014 at 11:22 pm
What nonsense…Building Control Regulations 2014 has just banned self building..so there will be absolutely no one off family homes built in rural ireland…construction 2020 a political stunt before elections…
May 16, 2014 at 9:12 am
In most rural counties almost 100% of all dwellings currently being permitted are ‘one-off’ houses. See here: http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Statire/SelectVarVal/Define.asp?maintable=BHQ01
This may also be of interest
https://irelandafternama.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/counting-the-cost-of-rurban-ireland/
May 16, 2014 at 9:25 am
Gavin, with all due respect – commencement notices since March 1st (implementation of the BC(A)R 2014), have fallen off a cliff – any self builds that have commenced since then are actually illegal builds and a whole raft of problems may or will arise for those owners in the future. If a person owns land they have an absolute right to construct a family home there and should not be urged to reside in designated settlements (North Korea comes to mind) – Ireland is now the only country in the world to ban self building – this is shocking..
May 16, 2014 at 10:28 am
Hi Amanda,
I completely disagree. As for the macro picture/statistics, quite apart from any personal circumstances…
There is no absolute right to build a family home anywhere. There is nowhere in the constitution or other law which confers such a right. Private property rights in the Constitution are subject to the exigenices of the ‘common good’. That is why we have a planning process, albeit a very poor one.
Ireland has not banned self building, far from it – one-in-four of all
private dwellings built since 2006 were one-off houses. The point of quoting planning statistics (quite apart from Commencement Notices) is that demand for such units currently represent 100% of demand in many counties.
As for the North Korea quip, the post I included demonstrates the very clear issues associated with the cumulative economic, social and environmental impact of dispersed housing. The EPA/UCD have prepared similar http://erc.epa.ie/safer/iso19115/displayISO19115.jsp?isoID=153
180,000 one-offs were permitted in Ireland since 2001, 98,000 were built
Currently there are 98,000 vacant.
May 16, 2014 at 10:12 am
Amanda, I live in a “designated settlement” and I have to say I’m very happy about that, and the quality of life it affords me and my family. Most countries in the world have some form of a planning system that seeks to guide and manage development. US, Canada, Germany, France…. spring to mind. Really don’t think you need to go to North Korea for an example. You’re factually and legally wrong to say a person has an ‘absolute right’ to construct a family home on land in there ownership.
The new Building Regulations do raise the bar for certification of work by a qualified professional. A lack of certification and professionalism in recent years has led to considerable criticism of the building regulations, particularly in cases like Priory Hall.
Like every country in the world, the demand for growth is in the big cities. Dublin in particular has a challenge to deliver 7,500 + units a year, and is about 8,000 bed spaces short in student accommodation. That’s quite an important issue too!
May 16, 2014 at 10:43 am
http://bregsforum.wordpress.com/2014/03/14/will-bcar-si-9-bring-any-benefit-to-consumers/ No new legal rights or remedies under these new Building Control Regulations – in fact Priory Hall will happen time and time again. Self Building has been banned since March 1st. Bad spatial strategy is one thing – the banning of citizens from building their own homes is another. I, too, have lived in London for many years – but please tell me you are not suggesting that citizens cannot choose the country or the city? BTW every country in the world accommodates the self build situation in their building control laws…
May 16, 2014 at 11:14 am
Hi Amanda – I think we are talking about different issues here. The issues which you are referring to are a side effect of the new building control laws for those certain people who wish to self-build i.e. they do not wish to contract an Assigned Certifier and a notice of assignment of a registered builder etc. Such an issue could equally arise where a person owns a small plot of land in a town/village or in a ‘designated settlement’.
However, the statement above “so there will be absolutely no one off family homes built in rural ireland” is not correct. A person who wishes to build a family home in rural Ireland can do so under the new building control provisions. In fact, building just started on one last week next to my parents house.
It is best not to conflate planning and building control issues on this – particularly in respect of the emotive issue of rural housing. In many countries, planning policy seeks to strictly control dispersed housing. For example, in the UK PPS7 “New building development in the open countryside away from existing settlements, or outside areas allocated for development in development plans, should be strictly controlled”.
For the record, I do not agree with the new Building Control Regulations. It should be the duty of the local authority to oversee all new builds and builders and self-builders should be the same oversight, including paying a fee/bond direct to the local authority.
May 16, 2014 at 11:22 am
Thank you Gavin. I wonder if your parents’ new neighbours have employed a contractor? I read life after Nama with interest. There is alot of people quite distressed at the moment over the self build debacle. Only time will tell how it all pans out…
May 16, 2014 at 12:16 pm
by the size and complexity of the plans, i assume they are using a contractor!
There is a building contractor sign at the gate
May 27, 2014 at 2:03 pm
There is no shortage of houses……….there is a shortage of purchasing power.
Building any more houses is crazy.
Dublin houses are up because that is simply where the money is (as a result of the centrazing vortice of bank money)
The real economy needs investment in primary capacity and not unneeded credit centric consumer goods.
I mean my God – there is a structural decline in Irish electrical energy consumption -AND YET WE TALK OF HOUSES !!!
http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Statire/SelectVarVal/Define.asp?maintable=MSM01
What that really means is even less energy consumption per house unit = more empty or cold houses
Giving mortagage holders the deeds of the house would have solved our housing problem – dramatically decreasing the cost of houses and thus increasing real purchasing power.
House building is merely restarting the bank scarcity engine and serves no physical economic function other then extraction.