The CIF are at it again. Apparently we need to start building houses again, as reported in the Sunday Indo. As usual, they use a selective choice of data to make their case, principally focusing on the supply side of things and ignoring the already existing oversupply and weak demand. Here is the glaring hole in their analysis.
The Census 2011 reports that there are 230,056 vacant units in the country (excluding holiday homes), of which 110K constitute oversupply on a base 6% vacancy rate. 36,000 of those are either brand new vacant or underconstruction units in unfinished estates. There are dozens of these estates in the Greater Dublin region and a lot of stock for sale/rent. Only South Dublin has a vacancy rate below 6 percent. According to the CSO, population growth in 2010 was 11,400, in 2011 it was 13,600. This was population not households. There was net out-migration of 34K in 2010 and 2011, principally of people aged 20-40 (household formation age), the big growth in population between 2006-2011 was children under the age of 5 (they aren’t buying anything soon). Where is the figure of 25K demand coming from?
There is a reason why only 8,000 units will be built this year – we don’t need any more. Between 1991 and 2011 there was 933K housing units built in Ireland, households went up by 625K, in other words we built 1.5 units for every one household. We need to work off this oversupply before we start building again. If supply and demand were in-line we would not have had a drop of 50% (so far) in house prices. We do need construction – green energy, ICT infrastructure, public utilities, public transport – stuff that will serves domestic and FDI companies and the general public, but not housing (we also don’t need offices or retail space – over 20% of office space in Dublin is vacant). Even if the units are built where is the mortgage credit coming from for buyers?
The CIF is a lobby group for house builders. No great surprise they want to build – they need the money to pay back NAMA/foreign banks on the other houses they built in-excess of demand. If they got their way and built more units then all they’d succeed in doing is continue to flatline the market by adding supply to oversupply. Of course nothing is stopping them from building other than finance and if they really believed their own mantra then there are thousands of sites with planning permission already granted and they can get on with it. The reality is that 1,822 unfinished estates have outstanding building work around the country where the developer is inactive due to lack of finance. Why would developers get finance for new developments when they can’t even finish off existing jobs (and who in their right mind is going to lend for construction given the data above)? Their plea suggests they want the government to do something – like commission house building or provide tax incentives. Hopefully their call will fall on deaf ears. We’re already paying the price for a spectacular property crash. We don’t need that situation made any worse.
Rob Kitchin
June 3, 2012 at 11:21 am
We are the masters of our own destiny…we can stop this or at the very least re-direct the situation. We can all make a difference..Please visit our Urban Tree Project.
http://www.celesteprize.com/artwork/ido:134782/
June 3, 2012 at 2:02 pm
Hear, Hear!!!
For my take on this whole sorry situation, may I refer you to my letter published in the Examiner (and I.Independent ) on “Ending the malign influence of property development on how we are governed” on Sat 4th October 2008 – within a week of the last Government’s Bank Guarantee
http://www.irishexaminer.com/archives/2008/1004/opinion/end-malign-influence-of-property-speculation-on-the-way-we-are-governed-73915.html
June 3, 2012 at 3:12 pm
There should be a complete moratorium on building anymore housing for a minimum of another 7 years at least. I certainly don’t want to have to listen to DCC high rise agenda for at least a decade, by then the mid-rise 5 to 7 storyey units will have become such a problem that we will have little choice other than to go back to sustainable development.
June 4, 2012 at 11:38 am
CIF produced a report in in February 2011 on vacant housing supply which suggested that there was enough vacant housing in Limerick for just the next 34 days!
http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/cif-report-shows-that-there-is-only-enough-housing-in-limerick-city-to-last-34-days/
The organisation has a patchy record on public information, and its claims about vacant housing often led to confusion because CIF seemed to confine its pronouncements to new housing on recently built estates only, which represent a small fraction of total vacant housing.
By the way, the CIF communications boss, Martin Whelan joined NAMA in January 2012 as its Relationship Manager, though his empire seems to be expanding with a new vacancy of Relationship Officer and Martin now appears to have the job title, Head of Relationship Management
June 4, 2012 at 5:34 pm
Thanks for this. We also posted on the CIF future of housing report.
https://irelandafternama.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/future-housing-supply-in-ireland/
https://irelandafternama.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/cif-future-housing-supply-in-ireland-report-one-year-on/
I have heard that a number of former CIF staff now work for NAMA. Would be interesting to know how many and in what roles.
June 5, 2012 at 12:29 pm
We all know there is a massive oversupply of housing but the great majority is pretty bad. This is an issue because Ireland is trying to attract high end multinationals whose workforces are made up of young, well educated, mobile professionals that want to live in high quality, contemporary accommodation. Outside of the major centres there is a very limited supply. In places such as Mallow and Kilkenny developers focused on building ‘traditional’ houses that were by no means architecturally inspirational. They did this because they knew mock Victorian houses would sell. Their attitude was simple, why take the risk of building quality, contemporary housing when there was no need to! Now NSS hub towns across the country are suffering from a dearth of housing that would be attractive to the mobile, professional class and the companies that employ them. Ultimately, this has reduced the chance of high end multinationals setting up in these hub towns. The tragedy is that in many places the people in power fail to recognise that 100 mock Tudor houses with bad light and ornamental pine kitchens are not going to be desirable to a French computer programmer. Quality not quantity!
June 7, 2012 at 10:48 am
[…] per our post earlier in the week, the CIF have recently been forwarding the argument that we need to start building again, […]
June 10, 2012 at 8:32 am
[…] Census) and population growth (from CSO). It is data that is frequently detailed on IAN (which we used to refute the CIF pronouncement last Sunday). Unfortunately, how DB interprets the data is totally misleading for a number of […]