An interesting and passionate opinion piece in the Irish Times today by Theo Dorgan arguing that representative democracy is simply not functioning as it should, at present. An argument that chimes Fintan O’Toole’s assertion in Ship of Fools, that Ireland is still not a mature democracy.
“This democracy of ours is breaking down, on a scale and in a manner that we have not seen before now, principally because there is now a profound contradiction between what we expect of government, and what government thinks it is there for. In my view, the Government now thinks its sole duty is to manage the State as if it were its own property. […]
However imperfect and in constant need of adjustment it may be, representative democracy seems the sanest and fairest practical way to regulate the complex business of the modern State. For representative democracy to work, there must be a complex relationship of trust between the ruled and the rulers.
If I am to be ruled, if I am to consent to be ruled, then I must grant government considerable latitude in its decision-making processes provided only and always that government acts honourably, scrupulously, fairly and attentively in the discharge of its business.
It has become terrifyingly clear that this Government is really, truly not listening to us. All criticism is dismissed, jibed at, spun out of meaning – as if we are not really there.
A licence to govern is not carte blanche to do as you please between regrettably necessary elections, to behave wilfully, even stupidly, between polling days, with a mental resolve to gloss over mistakes (and worse) in your pre-election literature in the hope of being returned to the merry-go-round. Government is a process, an ongoing process whose driving force, so to speak, is the constant renewal of mutual trust. […]
If we are to survive the present crisis we will need a government prepared to feel shame when it lets us down, prepared to put the national good before party or sectional interest, prepared to listen to, learn from and act upon the collective, unbiased intelligence, including the moral intelligence, of its own people.”
It’s an interesting piece. It’ll probably won’t be “dismissed, jibed at, spun out of meaning” as he fears, but rather the more usual strategy adopted – it’ll be ignored. Perhaps the most interesting thing in the Irish case, is that despite many people being unhappy with how the country is being governed, there is very little explicit, well organised protest or calls for political reform. We are a long way from pots and pans being used to bring down a government, as in Iceland. It seems we have little appetite for a ‘mature democracy’.
March 22, 2010 at 7:34 pm
The thoughtful piece above ends on a truly desperate note: that the miserable plight of the good people of this country will simply be ignored by their elected representatives. Ignored, indeed.
This American Irishman continues to shake his head in wonderment at the structure of a modern government that fails the most essential test of a democracy: that it is a government “of the people, for the people, by the people,” as the framers of the American declaration of independence intended for that nation.
That a government for Ireland might be so constructed suggests these principles:
1. The government must return to election on a sufficiently frequent basis to obtain the consent of the governed. Five years is simply too long. The Dail should have two-year terms and stand for election.
2. The government must be structured so as to accommodate both regional as well as local interests. There is a an appropriate role for a senate, truly reformed as an elected body along county and provincial lines — not the made-over “House of Lords” that we have in Ireland today. Such a senate could be organized so as to have six-year terms and stand for election every two years, with one-third standing for election in turn.
3. The government must have an appropriate definition of — and separation of — executive and legislative powers. A reconstituted Dail should have the Taoiseach as the chairman or leader of the house, not as the chief executive of government. The vice president could preside over the senate. Further, the government needs a judiciary completely independent of the executive and legislative branches.
4. It needs an executive that reflects a truly national perspective and is elected by and responsible to a national mandate. It needs a national president and vice-president, not a figurehead president and a “Council of State” for a vice-president.
5. It needs a provision for recall by impeachment of any member of the legislative, executive or judicial branches found guilty of violations of his/her oath or crimes against the state.
As I have written in these pages before, I say to one and all: If you want a better government, you need a bettter constitution. At this point, you may only apply patches to an old, leaky bucket — and any farmer will tell you that it doesn’t work for long or get any better.
The hairs on the back of my neck go up as I watch the casual and unrepentant thievery of Irish public officials. Golden handshakes, termination bonuses, extraordinary once-off payments and too-generous pensions are the norm, on top of travel expenses that have public employees living like royalty. I came to Ireland from a senior post in the U.S. Government, at the very top of the American civil service. When I left government, I got a lovely certificate, a firm handshake, and the right to collect my hard-earned pension. Had I taken as much as a single lunch from someone else, I would have been liable for dismissal and jail. Period.
Reforms are needed in both the structure of government and in the ethical standards expected of government officials. Until that happens, you will swap public officials back and forth among parties until there is only one thing left that you can be sure of: that the governemt and its officials have looked after themselves well and the poor Irish people are as desperate as ever!
If we are to have a mature democracy, then it is time for the very able Irish to put pen to paper — or fingers to keyboard — and write a new constitution for a modern and fully robust democracy. Volunteers, anyone?
January 11, 2012 at 3:04 pm
Would you suggest any better way to have more participative democracy rather than Representative elitisim where the all the modern democratic states are trapped.Where the system protects the right and interest of few rather than the common goods.any comments????
March 25, 2010 at 8:16 pm
1. Small town/county demographics, mean the poor cannot access the civic offices for any civil discussion of their housing plight, as civic offices can be very much an autocracy of workers in the public sector.
2. Small towns/villages’ centre commercial business premises are owned by ….? who? who? are the long-term ‘head’ leaseholders of these premises – who set the ‘rent’ any entrepreneur must pay? All hush hush. – Who would know this information? – Banks.
And for hundreds of years these big leaseholders and banks have been the puppet-masters in small towns? Ohoh the rent ‘must’ go up. Aw shucks, your business has failed. Off you go.
So, the poor are kept in their place : failure.
3. Now, the poor, with no assets, won’t qualify for even the smallest mortgage – the lads with wads of leases – will; qualify for loadsa cheap investment properties.
March 29, 2010 at 7:29 am
Kathy Durkin says:
Regarding social protests in Ireland, I have read news about union demonstrations against government austerity moves that were huge–in Dublin.