Cork’s independent arthouse cinema The Kino closed its doors on Sunday last following thirteen years in operation. The decision to close was the result of a high court injunction taken by an architectural firm against the owner, Mick Hannigan, for unpaid fee of €60,000. This arose from an aborted expansion plan for the cinema that would see it developed from a one-screen/one-storey structure to a three-screen complex with a bar/restaurant. Having secured a grant of €750,000 from the Cultural Cinema Consortium through the Arts Council to contribute to the cost of the redevelopment, which was anticipated to be completed for Cork’s year as European Capital of Culture in 2005, the costs of the proposed venture had begun to soar. Despite securing additional loans Mr. Hannigan was still €1 million short of the mark, and was forced to abandon the project.
Although the grant money was never drawn down in the end, sizable costs had stacked up for preparatory work including architectural designs. The Kino has always run under a precarious financial situation, bolstering itself through a few big hits throughout the year, which allowed the cinema to take a hit on the less popular films that were screened. After exhausting other options, Mr. Hannigan announced at the beginning of November that he would be closing the cinema in order to sell the building in order to pay back creditors. This sparked a series of grassroots actions. The setting up of a Facebook page helped gather public support which was translated into a public meeting and ultimately a website (www.savethekino.com) and a trustee bank account through which people could donate money to the cause of keeping the cinema open.
Despite these efforts, it seems, for the moment The Kino (at least in its current location) is no more. As an important cultural institution in Cork (but not just for Cork: it is the only independently run arthouse cinema in Ireland outside of Dublin) the loss of the Kino is a serious blow to the city’s cultural infrastructures. Combined with the closure of the Capitol Cinema a few years ago, whose owners moved their operations to the newly opened Mahon Point shopping centre, the loss of The Kino means that there is now only one cinema (The Gate) in Cork city centre. For a city that has used its perceived status as a ‘cultural city’ to bolster property development and investment over the last decade, this is a poor reflection.
What is interesting about the case of The Kino is what it says about the priorities of the state’s current interventions in the property market, epitomised by NAMA. The paltry unpaid fee that has forced The Kino to close its doors is way below the threshold for development loans to be taken into NAMA. On a lesser scale, however, this story is part of the same set of processes. At a time when development was the name of the game, the owner attempted to expand the cinema, got part way along the process, and was forced to abandon it due to inflating costs. Perhaps this is an example of a poorly timed speculative attempt at expansion, but much of the NAMA portfolio is characterised by the same set of conditions. While the banks and the major players are taken care of through NAMA smaller scale initiatives (of which the plans to redevelop The Kino are an iconic example) escape from the net. Granted, The Kino’s problems go way beyond that of their creditors: with poor attendance figures and increasing competition by the mainstream cinemas in the market for more high-profile independent films, the cinema has not found a way to run at a profit for some time, and this latest crisis has merely pushed it over the edge. Nevertheless, I still think it is worth considering the plight of The Kino side by side with NAMA for a moment, in that it starkly contrasts the state’s massive investment in the carcass of the property market and the simultaneous disinvestment in the arts (on a related note check out http://www.ncfa.ie/). The loss of such an institution as The Kino to many aspects of Cork’s cultural and social life should not be underestimated, and it flies directly in the face of the development discourses propagated by City Council for the last decade. It is also characteristic of the lack of spatial and social priorities of the government through their backing of NAMA. Rather than looking at the impact of the economic crisis on cities and towns around the country, NAMA sees everything one big property portfolio. There is a need to escape this logic in order to take stock of what we are really (and rapidly) loosing in the places we live.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/1201/1224259803873.html
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/1126/1224259487538.html
http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/corks-arthouse-kino-cinema-facing-its-final-reel-104377.html
http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/kfauojauojcw/rss2/
Cian O’ Callaghan
December 1, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Further evidence Cian that this government does not govern on our behalf (people who live in places that might want something other than what Hollywood offers) but on capital’s behalf.
December 1, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Very true – it seems to be getting increasingly difficult to keep anything in the city centre that isn’t going to make the maximum amount of money
December 1, 2009 at 3:49 pm
A welcome article Cian. Just to point out though that the debt which pushed Kino over the edge, is €60,000 not €6K; a typo I’m sure. In fact all in, the more accurate figure is €100K. In any case, I think a further point is that Kino was never in it’s 13 years profit making but had a core loyal audience, that could have developed with more encouragement. The experience has proven that it would take public investment and responsibility, to give Cork City the arthouse cinema it deserves.
December 1, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Hi Una,
Sorry yes careless typo there Im afraid. Thanks also for your input. I agree with you there. I would have been a regular visitor to the Kino when I was living in Cork (and I still got in once a month maybe if I was down for weekends after I moved away) and its hard not to notice that you’re often only sharing the screen with four or five other people. I think some sort of public investment is definately needed and that supporting places like the Kino should be a local and national priority.
Cian
December 3, 2009 at 8:50 am
Hi
Good site! Keep it up.
Get used to having lots of worthwhile operations going to the wall. Look at Latvia. Ireland has borrowed 54,000,000,000 and will spend billions on fees to nurse useless overpriced land.
Vote? Action? Reaction? Stand for office as independents.
December 3, 2009 at 8:29 pm
Bankruptcies are part of the cycle of rationalizing the economy. The opportunty is there now for someone else to run the business from a lower cost base.
December 22, 2009 at 2:23 pm
[…] Cork, shopping, sustainable communities | Leave a Comment Just a couple of weeks after the closure of the Kino cinema it’s more bad news for all things good in Cork. Plugd, the city’s only remaining independent […]
January 16, 2010 at 11:18 am
Interesting article. I’m not sure the Mick-Hannigan-As-Developer simile is valid though. Someone who committed 13 years of his life to the art-form he loves is not in the same category as Bernard MacNamara or Seán Quinn. If the term ‘developer’ is to include Mick it’s meaningless and useless.
But you’re right about many other things, including the hypocrisy of the City Council which profits from The Film Festival but won;t support film. Also, it’s worth pointing out that the Kino is the second iconic cultural venue in Cork to be closed by The Year Of Culture. The Lobby went down because of it too.
January 16, 2010 at 11:19 am
Sorry about the nomme de guerre – it’s my wordpress nickname. That post above is by William Wall.
January 18, 2010 at 12:53 pm
William, thanks for your comments. My intention was never to place Mick Hannigan in the category of developer, and I think the plans to upgrade the Kino were primarily about trying to expand the service rather than extract maximum commercial value from the premises (I think it is fair to say that if this way the aim he wouldn’t be running an art house cinema).
Rather what I wanted to highlight was two things. Firstly that in Cork, since being awarded the Cork 2005 event, the city’s cultural facilities and festivals have often been used as a way of selling the city for development and investment. The prestige offered to Cork by hosting the Capital of Culture also stimulated other related investments in the city. The fact that venues like the Kino and the Lobby were allowed to close indicates that while they are drawn upon to present certain favourable images of the city, cultural institutions like these are not being seriously supported.
The second point I was making is related. As NAMA is such a huge financial investment of tax revenue, it has impacts on all other areas of social provision. Last December’s budget was an indication of this – as other posts on this blog have suggested: see https://irelandafternama.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/%E2%80%98trickle-up%E2%80%99-economics-deconstructing-budgetary-priorities/ for example. These types of cutbacks will continue to be made. Funding for the arts and for institutions like the Kino is just one example.
Of course it is a matter of judgement whether or not one feels it is important to have an art house cinema in Cork – personally I think it is. An art house cinema will probably never run at a profit in a city the size of Cork, so it therefore goes back to whether or not it is seen as a public priority to provide for this. This argument can carried over into the provision of social welfare and social housing in that it asks questions about what type of society we want to live in. The investment in NAMA implicitly makes these decisions because it closes off other options. How NAMA unfolds over time should therefore be seen as having implications in many other sectors of society.
Cian
January 18, 2010 at 1:03 pm
Agreed on all points. These decisions of government are presented as ‘practical’, ‘pragmatic’, ‘necessary’, ‘unavoidable’ when they are in fact Political. It IS political to save the banks and and screw the Christmas Bonus, it WAS political to build 220,000 surplus houses (we built them through tax breaks) instead of clearing the housing list, it WAS political to support Comhaltas Ceolteoirí Eireann (more power to them) and not Kino.
February 6, 2010 at 12:46 pm
Restart the Kino is the old cinema on Grand Parade! It is not as it they are going to use that site for apartments now.
We need to think about that to do with sites like this across the country – I say do them up and use them for cultural and education purposes.
I know that there is sod-all money in the country – but we still need our tourist industry and no tourist wants to visit a boarded up street.
(I am not from Cork – and havent been there in a while – so any clarifications about the current situation is cordially invited)
February 9, 2010 at 12:47 pm
@ kobriendublin
You make a good point here. Of course there are a number of problems with this argument also.
As it stands (if I am correct) the Capitol cinema is owned by a developer who had plans to turn it into a shopping centre through combining it with a number of adjoining properties to the rear of the site. Although this development has been quiet of late I cannot be certain that it is dead in the water either.
If the developer was open to this plan, presumably he would want to make his money back on the premises, which means you would either have a situation where the kino were renting the premises or the site would be sold to the operators. Both of these are problematic – in the first instance the Kino would have to be making a profit to pay the rents, in the second they would need to raise capital (presumably a lot more than what the old premises was worth) to purchase the building.
Additionally, the cost of operating out of a 6 screen (as opposed to a single screen) would be more. Perhaps there are grounds for some sort of shared venture, however: for example sharing the space with a more mainstream oriented cinema, or alternatively converting part of the building to other uses (bar, restaurant etc).
I agree with the points you make about investing in cultural and educational facilities, and the potential benefits for the tourism industry. More creative responses like this are needed. What is also needed to achieve this however is a more substantial buy in from the state in terms of raising the capital needed and putting in place policies to enable such schemes to get off the ground.
Cian
February 10, 2012 at 9:51 pm
Looks like the Kino is not going to be developed as it has just surfaced on Daft today and Proposals are invited for renting.
http://www.daft.ie/searchcommercial.daft?id=91843